- Home
- Ground Truth
- Town explorer
- Tewksbury, MA
Middlesex CountyMassachusetts
Tewksbury, Massachusetts
- Live · as of Sep 11, 2026
- 9 public sources · method
- ← All towns
Median depth to bedrock
30 ft
middle half 18–50 ft · 169 logs
Bridges rated poor
4
of 15 inventoried
Poor high-hazard dams
1
National Inventory of Dams
Construction projects
25
median $903K · public bid results
01 · Dams & disasters
1 high-hazard dam needs work
| Dam | Condition | Built |
|---|---|---|
| Ames Pond DamMeadow Brook | Poor | — |
High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.
FEMA Public Assistance, Middlesex County
$656M
02 · Bridges
4 of 15 bridges are rated poor — above the Massachusetts rate of 9%
13% good, 27% poor
- Good2 · 13%
- Fair9 · 60%
- Poor4 · 27%
Structures by decade built
▸ Show the numbers▾ Hide the numbers
| Built | Structures |
|---|---|
| 1930s | 1 |
| 1950s | 4 |
| 1960s | 6 |
| 1970s | 1 |
| 1990s | 2 |
| 2000s | 1 |
The poor-rated bridges
| Carries | Over | Built | Daily traffic |
|---|---|---|---|
| I 495 SB | ST 38 MAIN ST | 1961 | 68,981 |
| I 495 NB | ST133 ANDOVER ST | 1961 | 60,988 |
| NORTH STposted | I 495 | 1961 | 6,200 |
| TRULL RD | I 495 | 1962 | 1,810 |
03 · Ground
Rock turns up a median 30 ft down
Half of Tewksbury's logs reach rock between 18 and 50 ft
▸ Show the numbers▾ Hide the numbers
| Depth to rock (ft) | Logs |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | 6 |
| 5–10 | 10 |
| 10–20 | 28 |
| 20–50 | 81 |
| 50–100 | 40 |
| 100+ | 4 |
Rock within 10 ft
14%
04 · Money & permits
25 construction projects on file, median $903K — at or below the state's $1.5M
Public construction projects
25
05 · Next door
Tewksbury and the 6 towns that border it
| Town | Poor bridges | Rock depth |
|---|---|---|
| Tewksbury, MA | 4 / 15 | 30 ft |
| Lowell, MA | 10 / 85 | 35 ft |
| Chelmsford, MA | 3 / 51 | 22 ft |
| Andover, MA | 7 / 38 | 17 ft |
| Billerica, MA | 0 / 23 | 18 ft |
| Wilmington, MA | 2 / 23 | 15 ft |
| Dracut, MA | 0 / 5 | 20 ft |
Where these numbers come from
Method, sources & caveats
Tewksbury is the Census county subdivision 2501769415 (Middlesex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).
- Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
- Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
- Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
- Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
- Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
- FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
- Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
- Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
- Data as of
- Sep 11, 2026
- Generated
- Sep 11, 2026
- Records
- 367,748
- Refresh
- Live pull · weekly
- U.S. Census Bureau cartographic boundary files — county subdivisions (2024, 1:500k)Public domain
- FHWA National Bridge Inventory (2025 delimited files)Public domain
- USACE National Inventory of DamsPublic domainHigh-hazard dams rated Poor or Unsatisfactory (live NID).
- USGS U.S. Landslide InventoryPublic domain
- MassGIS / Massachusetts Geological Survey — Bedrock Data PointsPublic recordBorings and well logs that reached rock (MassDEP well drillers, USGS, MWRA, MassDOT…); seismic/HVSR and map-derived shallow-bedrock/outcrop points excluded.
- NH DES Water Well Inventory, Maine Geological Survey Wells Database, Vermont DEC well recordsPublic recordBedrock wells only; driller-reported depth to bedrock / overburden thickness.
- OpenFEMA Public Assistance Funded Projects Details (v2)Public domain
- MA EEA / CZM grant awards — Dam & Seawall, MVP Action, CZM Coastal ResiliencePublic record
- Municipal open-data permit portals (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Providence, Portsmouth, others)Public recordOnly permits flagged as ground-related (retaining walls, excavation, foundations) are counted.
Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.
