Earth Support Corp

Middlesex CountyMassachusetts

Lowell, Massachusetts

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. 10 of its 85 inventoried bridges are rated poor (12%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

35 ft

middle half 16–59 ft · 105 logs

Bridges rated poor

10

of 85 inventoried · 1 closed

State resilience grants

$138K

1 award on file

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Middlesex County-wide context, not a Lowell number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Lowell
DamConditionBuilt
Guard Lock & GatesPawtucket CanalPoor1848

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Middlesex County

$656M

Federal share obligated across 1,729 projects in 12 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (97%); roads & bridges took $1.2M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

10 of 85 bridges are rated poor — above the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Lowell. Median age 66 years; 7 posted for weight; 1 closed.

28% good, 12% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good24 · 28%
  • Fair51 · 60%
  • Poor10 · 12%

Structures by decade built

05101520pre-19101910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
n = 85 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-191018
1910s6
1920s1
1930s2
1940s1
1950s8
1960s19
1970s3
1980s4
1990s5
2000s2
2010s13
2020s3

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Lowell
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
I 495 SBPAN AM196168,981
I 495 NBPAN AM196164,233
BRIDGE STEASTERN CANAL193718,230
NB LOWLL CONI 495195917,180
ST 3 A/GORHAM STRIVER MEADOW BROOK196014,012
SB LOWLL CONI 495195911,013
BOYLSTON STI 495196110,600
LWLL CN B-10LOWEL CON RAMP B819597,860
HALL STWESTERN CANAL19103,500
SUFFOLK STclosedNORTHERN CANAL18480
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 35 ft down

From 105 depth-to-rock records inside Lowell (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Lowell's logs reach rock between 16 and 59 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 35 ft
MA 24 ft
0255075 ft
0102030400–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 105 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–52
5–107
10–2027
20–5036
50–10029
100+4

Rock within 10 ft

11%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 31% of logs here go past 50 ft.

04 · Money & permits

39 construction projects on file, median $950K — at or below the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Lowell
ProjectYearAward
Claypit Brook Climate Resilience Stormwater Management Capital Improvement PlanFY2021$138K

Public construction projects

39

Median estimated value $950K, middle half $295K–$2.7M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $106M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

05 · Next door

Lowell and the 5 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Lowell compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Lowell, MA10 / 8535 ft
Chelmsford, MA3 / 5122 ft
Billerica, MA0 / 2318 ft
Tewksbury, MA4 / 1530 ft
Tyngsborough, MA0 / 1015 ft
Dracut, MA0 / 520 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Lowell is the Census county subdivision 2501737000 (Middlesex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote