Earth Support Corp

Windsor CountyVermont

Royalton, Vermont

Bedrock sits a median 15 ft down across 591 logs, shallower than the Vermont median of 20 ft. 5 of its 20 inventoried bridges are rated poor (25%, against 4% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

15 ft

middle half 7–34 ft · 591 logs

Bridges rated poor

5

of 20 inventoried · 2 closed

Mapped landslides

2

USGS inventory points

FEMA repair $, Windsor County

$90.5M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Rock is close to the surface: 43% of logs hit it within 10 ft

From 591 depth-to-rock records inside Royalton (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Royalton's logs reach rock between 7 and 34 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 15 ft
VT 20 ft
0204060 ft
0501001502000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 591 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–582
5–10129
10–20130
20–50154
50–10077
100+19

Rock within 10 ft

43%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 15% of logs here go past 50 ft.

Mapped landslides

2

2 landslide. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.

02 · Bridges

5 of 20 bridges are rated poor — above the Vermont rate of 4%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Royalton. Median age 58 years; 4 posted for weight; 2 closed.

20% good, 25% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good4 · 20%
  • Fair11 · 55%
  • Poor5 · 25%

Structures by decade built

024681910s1920s1930s1940s1960s2000s2010s
n = 20 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1910s1
1920s2
1930s4
1940s1
1960s7
2000s2
2010s3

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Royalton
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
I 00089 MLI 89 OVER WR&NECR&107196815,800
C2006closedWHITE RIVER1928500
C2002closedBROAD BROOK1940160
C3092posted1ST BRANCH WHITE R.191920
C3055postedBROAD BROOK193310
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Dams & disasters

Windsor County has drawn $90.5M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Windsor County-wide context, not a Royalton number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Windsor County

$90.5M

Federal share obligated across 1,345 projects in 8 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (86%); roads & bridges took $77.4M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Next door

Royalton and the 7 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Royalton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Royalton, VT5 / 2015 ft
Randolph, VT0 / 2515 ft
Bethel, VT0 / 2322 ft
Strafford, VT0 / 1610 ft
Sharon, VT0 / 1410 ft
Barnard, VT2 / 1210 ft
Tunbridge, VT0 / 1010 ft
Pomfret, VT0 / 59 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Royalton is the Census county subdivision 5002760850 (Windsor County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote