Earth Support Corp

Franklin CountyVermont

Fairfax, Vermont

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 32 ft down across 1,226 logs, deeper than the Vermont median of 20 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

32 ft

middle half 12–66 ft · 1,226 logs

Bridges rated poor

0

of 11 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

Mapped landslides

2

USGS inventory points

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Franklin County-wide context, not a Fairfax number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Fairfax
DamConditionBuilt
St. Albans North ReservoirMill RiverPoor1895

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Franklin County

$6.9M

Federal share obligated across 193 projects in 12 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (68%); roads & bridges took $4.7M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 32 ft down

From 1,226 depth-to-rock records inside Fairfax (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Fairfax's logs reach rock between 12 and 66 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 32 ft
VT 20 ft
050100 ft
01002003004000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 1,226 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–596
5–10133
10–20198
20–50355
50–100279
100+165

Rock within 10 ft

23%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 35% of logs here go past 50 ft.

Mapped landslides

2

2 mass failure. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.

03 · Bridges

None of Fairfax's 11 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Fairfax. Median age 41 years; 1 posted for weight.

64% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good7 · 64%
  • Fair4 · 36%
  • Poor0 · 0%
n = 11 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19101
1930s2
1950s1
1970s1
1980s3
2000s2
2020s1

04 · Money & permits

1 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

1

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

05 · Next door

Fairfax and the 7 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Fairfax compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Fairfax, VT0 / 1132 ft
Cambridge, VT0 / 1827 ft
Fairfield, VT1 / 1420 ft
St. Albans town, VT0 / 1316 ft
Georgia, VT0 / 1130 ft
Milton, VT0 / 839 ft
Westford, VT0 / 420 ft
Fletcher, VT0 / 320 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Fairfax is the Census county subdivision 5001124925 (Franklin County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote