Earth Support Corp

Bristol CountyMassachusetts

North Attleborough Town, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 17 ft down across 112 logs, shallower than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 2 of its 21 inventoried bridges are rated poor (10%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

17 ft

middle half 10–25 ft · 112 logs

Bridges rated poor

2

of 21 inventoried

State resilience grants

$157K

1 award on file

Construction projects

12

median $712K · public bid results

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 17 ft down

From 112 depth-to-rock records inside North Attleborough Town (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of North Attleborough Town's logs reach rock between 10 and 25 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 17 ft
MA 24 ft
0102030 ft
010203040500–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 112 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–52
5–1025
10–2038
20–5043
50–1004
100+0

Rock within 10 ft

30%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 4% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Money & permits

12 construction projects on file, median $712K — at or below the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in North Attleborough Town
ProjectYearAward
Falls Pond Dam Structural Repairs & Invasive Species ManagementFY2023$157K

Public construction projects

12

Median estimated value $712K, middle half $372K–$2.2M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $18.9M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

03 · Bridges

2 of 21 bridges are rated poor — about the same as the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside North Attleborough Town. Median age 60 years.

19% good, 10% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good4 · 19%
  • Fair15 · 71%
  • Poor2 · 10%

Structures by decade built

02468101214pre-19101950s1960s1970s1990s2000s
n = 21 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19103
1950s1
1960s13
1970s2
1990s1
2000s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in North Attleborough Town
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
TONER BLVDI 95196033,600
MENDON RDABBOTT RUN RIVER18507,370
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Dams & disasters

Bristol County has drawn $112M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Bristol County-wide context, not a North Attleborough Town number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Bristol County

$112M

Federal share obligated across 770 projects in 11 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (90%); roads & bridges took $3.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

North Attleborough Town and the 5 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
North Attleborough Town compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
North Attleborough Town, MA2 / 2117 ft
Attleboro, MA0 / 5026 ft
Cumberland, RI6 / 32
Mansfield, MA2 / 2922 ft
Foxborough, MA1 / 2322 ft
Plainville, MA0 / 220 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

North Attleborough Town is the Census county subdivision 2500546598 (Bristol County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote