Bristol CountyMassachusetts
Attleboro, Massachusetts
2 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 26 ft down across 134 logs, close to the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.
- Live · as of Sep 11, 2026
- 9 public sources · method
- ← All towns
Median depth to bedrock
26 ft
middle half 15–37 ft · 134 logs
Bridges rated poor
0
of 50 inventoried
State resilience grants
$1.0M
4 awards on file
Poor high-hazard dams
2
National Inventory of Dams
01 · Dams & disasters
2 high-hazard dams need work
FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Bristol County-wide context, not a Attleboro number.
| Dam | Condition | Built |
|---|---|---|
| Manchester Pond Reservoir South DikeFourmile Brook | Poor | 1963 |
| Manchester Pond Reservoir East DikeFourmile Brook | Poor | 1963 |
High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.
FEMA Public Assistance, Bristol County
$112M
Federal share obligated across 770 projects in 11 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (90%); roads & bridges took $3.6M.
02 · Ground
Rock turns up a median 26 ft down
From 134 depth-to-rock records inside Attleboro (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.
Half of Attleboro's logs reach rock between 15 and 37 ft
Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 26 ftMA 24 ft
02040 ft
n = 134 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers▾ Hide the numbers
| Depth to rock (ft) | Logs |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | 2 |
| 5–10 | 8 |
| 10–20 | 38 |
| 20–50 | 70 |
| 50–100 | 13 |
| 100+ | 3 |
Rock within 10 ft
13%
of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 11% of logs here go past 50 ft.
Mapped landslides
1
1 landslide. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.
03 · Bridges
None of Attleboro's 50 bridges is rated poor
Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Attleboro. Median age 62 years; 1 posted for weight.
36% good, 0% poor
FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
- Good18 · 36%
- Fair32 · 64%
- Poor0 · 0%
Structures by decade built
n = 50 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers▾ Hide the numbers
| Built | Structures |
|---|---|
| pre-1910 | 4 |
| 1920s | 2 |
| 1930s | 1 |
| 1940s | 1 |
| 1950s | 12 |
| 1960s | 13 |
| 1970s | 1 |
| 1980s | 1 |
| 1990s | 5 |
| 2000s | 4 |
| 2010s | 6 |
04 · Money & permits
25 construction projects on file, median $892K — at or below the state's $1.5M
| Project | Year | Award |
|---|---|---|
| Dodgeville Pond Dam Repair 2 | FY2018 | $500K |
| Dodgeville Pond Dam Repair | FY2017 | $250K |
| Hoppin Hill Reservoir Repair | FY2015 | $160K |
| Dodgeville Dam Repair Design | FY2016 | $126K |
Public construction projects
25
Median estimated value $892K, middle half $300K–$2.3M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $150M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.
05 · Next door
Attleboro and the 8 towns that border it
A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
| Town | Poor bridges | Rock depth |
|---|---|---|
| Attleboro, MA | 0 / 50 | 26 ft |
| Pawtucket, RI | 6 / 42 | — |
| Cumberland, RI | 6 / 32 | — |
| Mansfield, MA | 2 / 29 | 22 ft |
| Norton, MA | 2 / 23 | 26 ft |
| North Attleborough Town, MA | 2 / 21 | 17 ft |
| Rehoboth, MA | 3 / 10 | 26 ft |
| Central Falls, RI | 1 / 5 | — |
| Seekonk, MA | 0 / 4 | 36 ft |
Where these numbers come from
Method, sources & caveats
Attleboro is the Census county subdivision 2500502690 (Bristol County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).
- Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
- Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
- Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
- Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
- Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
- FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
- Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
- Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
- Data as of
- Sep 11, 2026
- Generated
- Sep 11, 2026
- Records
- 367,748
- Refresh
- Live pull · weekly
- U.S. Census Bureau cartographic boundary files — county subdivisions (2024, 1:500k)Public domain
- FHWA National Bridge Inventory (2025 delimited files)Public domain
- USACE National Inventory of DamsPublic domainHigh-hazard dams rated Poor or Unsatisfactory (live NID).
- USGS U.S. Landslide InventoryPublic domain
- MassGIS / Massachusetts Geological Survey — Bedrock Data PointsPublic recordBorings and well logs that reached rock (MassDEP well drillers, USGS, MWRA, MassDOT…); seismic/HVSR and map-derived shallow-bedrock/outcrop points excluded.
- NH DES Water Well Inventory, Maine Geological Survey Wells Database, Vermont DEC well recordsPublic recordBedrock wells only; driller-reported depth to bedrock / overburden thickness.
- OpenFEMA Public Assistance Funded Projects Details (v2)Public domain
- MA EEA / CZM grant awards — Dam & Seawall, MVP Action, CZM Coastal ResiliencePublic record
- Municipal open-data permit portals (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Providence, Portsmouth, others)Public recordOnly permits flagged as ground-related (retaining walls, excavation, foundations) are counted.
Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.