Earth Support Corp

Middlesex CountyMassachusetts

Newton, Massachusetts

10 of its 49 inventoried bridges are rated poor (20%, against 9% statewide). Bedrock sits a median 30 ft down across 244 logs, deeper than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

30 ft

middle half 12–65 ft · 244 logs

Bridges rated poor

10

of 49 inventoried

Construction projects

63

median $1.8M · public bid results

FEMA repair $, Middlesex County

$656M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Bridges

10 of 49 bridges are rated poor — above the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Newton. Median age 64 years; 1 posted for weight.

6% good, 20% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good3 · 6%
  • Fair36 · 73%
  • Poor10 · 20%

Structures by decade built

051015202530pre-19101910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s
n = 49 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-191011
1910s1
1920s1
1930s6
1940s1
1950s3
1960s26

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Newton
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
I 95 ST128QUINOBEQUIN RD1950142,579
ST 9 BOYLSTON STTR GREEN LINE D190596,206
I 90 RAMPS A & BCHARLES RIVER195780,100
CENTRE STI 90 & CSX/MBTA196431,422
WALNUT STTR GREEN LINE D190624,569
WALNUT STI 90 & CSX/MBTA196419,784
ST 16 WB/WSHGTN STI 90 & CSX/MBTA196418,491
LOWELL AVEI 90 & CSX/MBTA196414,224
AUBURN STI 90 & CSX/MBTA19649,181
HIGHLAND STI 90 & CSX/MBTA19646,724
Every poor bridge in New England

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 30 ft down

From 244 depth-to-rock records inside Newton (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Newton's logs reach rock between 12 and 65 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 30 ft
MA 24 ft
0255075 ft
0204060801000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 244 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–56
5–1026
10–2049
20–5084
50–10060
100+19

Rock within 10 ft

18%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 31% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Dams & disasters

Middlesex County has drawn $656M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Middlesex County-wide context, not a Newton number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Middlesex County

$656M

Federal share obligated across 1,729 projects in 12 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (97%); roads & bridges took $1.2M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Money & permits

63 construction projects on file, median $1.8M — above the state's $1.5M

Public construction projects

63

Median estimated value $1.8M, middle half $720K–$9.5M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $587M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

05 · Next door

Newton and the 7 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Newton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Newton, MA10 / 4930 ft
Boston, MA41 / 40492 ft
Weston, MA1 / 4312 ft
Wellesley, MA0 / 1725 ft
Waltham, MA4 / 1712 ft
Needham, MA2 / 1415 ft
Brookline, MA0 / 1011 ft
Watertown, MA0 / 451 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Newton is the Census county subdivision 2501745560 (Middlesex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote