Earth Support Corp

Essex CountyMassachusetts

Ipswich, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 30 ft down across 71 logs, deeper than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 1 of its 9 inventoried bridges is rated poor (11%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

30 ft

middle half 18–71 ft · 71 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 9 inventoried

State resilience grants

$2.1M

6 awards on file

FEMA repair $, Essex County

$107M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 30 ft down

From 71 depth-to-rock records inside Ipswich (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Ipswich's logs reach rock between 18 and 71 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 30 ft
MA 24 ft
050100 ft
05101520250–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 71 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–54
5–103
10–2014
20–5025
50–10016
100+9

Rock within 10 ft

14%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 35% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Money & permits

$2.1M in state resilience grants, 6 awards

State resilience grant awards in Ipswich
ProjectYearAward
FY24 Dow Brook Reservoir Dam RepairFY2024$1.0M
Dow Brook Reservoir Dam RepairFY2019$712K
Building Climate Resilience Through Adaptation at the Crane Estate – Argilla Road Adaptation PermittingFY2023$113K
Building Climate Resilience Through Adaptation at the Crane Estate - Argilla Road Adaptation Phase 3FY2021$85K
A Focus on Our Most Vulnerable PlacesFY2020$82K
Ipswich Mill Dam Removal DesignFY2021$75K

03 · Bridges

1 of 9 bridges are rated poor — above the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Ipswich. Median age 99 years; 1 posted for weight.

11% good, 11% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good1 · 11%
  • Fair7 · 78%
  • Poor1 · 11%
n = 9 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19104
1920s1
1950s1
1980s1
1990s1
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Ipswich
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
COUNTY STpostedIPSWICH RIVER18612,700
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Dams & disasters

Essex County has drawn $107M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Essex County-wide context, not a Ipswich number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Essex County

$107M

Federal share obligated across 1,095 projects in 10 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (79%); roads & bridges took $1.3M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

Ipswich and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Ipswich compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Ipswich, MA1 / 930 ft
Gloucester, MA1 / 145 ft
Boxford, MA0 / 1320 ft
Topsfield, MA1 / 731 ft
Hamilton, MA1 / 435 ft
Rowley, MA1 / 422 ft
Essex, MA0 / 18 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Ipswich is the Census county subdivision 2500932310 (Essex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote