Earth Support Corp

Essex CountyMassachusetts

Gloucester, Massachusetts

The town has won $8.6M in state resilience grants across 11 awards. Bedrock sits a median 5 ft down across 138 logs, shallower than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

5 ft

middle half 3–10 ft · 138 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 14 inventoried

State resilience grants

$8.6M

11 awards on file

Poor high-hazard dams

7

National Inventory of Dams

01 · Money & permits

$8.6M in state resilience grants, 11 awards

State resilience grant awards in Gloucester
ProjectYearAward
Gloucester High School Flood Mitigation BarrierFY2021$2.4M
Haskell Reservoir Dam Repair Phase 2FY2018$1.3M
Babson Reservoir Dam RepairFY2014$1.0M
Haskell Reservoir Dam RepairFY2017$1.0M
Lane's Cove Breakwater RepairFY2018$1.0M
Haskell Pond Dam Repair Phase IIIFY2021$1.0M
Blynman Canal Bulkhead RepairFY2016$505K
Haskell Reservoir Dam Repair DesignFY2016$175K

Largest 8 of 11 awards shown.

Public construction projects

18

Median estimated value $1.8M, middle half $428K–$4.0M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $58.6M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

02 · Ground

Rock is close to the surface: 79% of logs hit it within 10 ft

From 138 depth-to-rock records inside Gloucester (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Gloucester's logs reach rock between 3 and 10 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 5 ft
MA 24 ft
01020 ft
0204060800–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 138 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–566
5–1037
10–2020
20–5013
50–1002
100+0

Rock within 10 ft

79%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 1% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Dams & disasters

7 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Essex County-wide context, not a Gloucester number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Gloucester
DamConditionBuilt
Haskell Pond DamWalker CreekPoor1903
Wallace Pond DamTributary to Little RiverPoor1850
Fernwood Lake North DamAnnisquam RiverPoor1877
Upper Banjo Pond DamTributary to Annisquam RiverPoor1908
Strangman Pond DamTributary to Annisquam RiverPoor1884
Fernwood Lake East DamTributary to Annisquam RiverPoor1877
Fernwood Lake West DamLittle River BasinPoor1877

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Essex County

$107M

Federal share obligated across 1,095 projects in 10 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (79%); roads & bridges took $1.3M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Bridges

1 of 14 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Gloucester. Median age 78 years.

7% good, 7% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good1 · 7%
  • Fair12 · 86%
  • Poor1 · 7%
n = 14 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19104
1920s1
1940s4
1950s4
2000s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Gloucester
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
ST127 WESTERN AVEBLYNMAN CANAL19064,886
Every poor bridge in New England

05 · Next door

Gloucester and the 4 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Gloucester compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Gloucester, MA1 / 145 ft
Ipswich, MA1 / 930 ft
Manchester-by-the-Sea, MA1 / 47 ft
Essex, MA0 / 18 ft
Rockport, MA0 / 16 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Gloucester is the Census county subdivision 2500926150 (Essex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote