Earth Support Corp

Bristol CountyMassachusetts

Easton, Massachusetts

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 21 ft down across 214 logs, close to the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

21 ft

middle half 14–36 ft · 214 logs

Bridges rated poor

0

of 3 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

Construction projects

17

median $1.6M · public bid results

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Bristol County-wide context, not a Easton number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Easton
DamConditionBuilt
Morse Pond DamQueset BrookPoor1920

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Bristol County

$112M

Federal share obligated across 770 projects in 11 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (90%); roads & bridges took $3.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 21 ft down

From 214 depth-to-rock records inside Easton (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Easton's logs reach rock between 14 and 36 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 21 ft
MA 24 ft
02040 ft
0204060801000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 214 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–54
5–1020
10–2070
20–5095
50–10020
100+5

Rock within 10 ft

14%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 11% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Bridges

None of Easton's 3 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Easton. Median age 38 years.

67% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good2 · 67%
  • Fair1 · 33%
  • Poor0 · 0%
n = 3 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1960s1
1980s1
2000s1

04 · Money & permits

17 construction projects on file, median $1.6M — above the state's $1.5M

Public construction projects

17

Median estimated value $1.6M, middle half $666K–$8.0M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $90.4M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

05 · Next door

Easton and the 8 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Easton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Easton, MA0 / 321 ft
Taunton, MA3 / 4335 ft
Brockton, MA1 / 3720 ft
Mansfield, MA2 / 2922 ft
Norton, MA2 / 2326 ft
Raynham, MA0 / 1828 ft
Sharon, MA0 / 1624 ft
West Bridgewater, MA3 / 1423 ft
Stoughton, MA0 / 222 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Easton is the Census county subdivision 2500520100 (Bristol County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote