Earth Support Corp

Plymouth CountyMassachusetts

Brockton, Massachusetts

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 20 ft down across 573 logs, shallower than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

20 ft

middle half 12–31 ft · 573 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 37 inventoried

State resilience grants

$468K

3 awards on file

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Plymouth County-wide context, not a Brockton number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Brockton
DamConditionBuilt
Ellis Brett Pond DamSalisbury BrookPoor1930

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Plymouth County

$60.4M

Federal share obligated across 866 projects in 10 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (65%); roads & bridges took $1.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 20 ft down

From 573 depth-to-rock records inside Brockton (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Brockton's logs reach rock between 12 and 31 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 20 ft
MA 24 ft
02040 ft
0501001502002503000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 573 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–512
5–1052
10–20186
20–50262
50–10057
100+4

Rock within 10 ft

21%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 9% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Bridges

1 of 37 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Brockton. Median age 71 years; 2 posted for weight.

30% good, 3% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good11 · 30%
  • Fair25 · 68%
  • Poor1 · 3%

Structures by decade built

02468pre-19101910s1930s1940s1950s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s
n = 37 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19107
1910s4
1930s1
1940s1
1950s6
1970s4
1980s4
1990s6
2000s2
2010s2

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Brockton
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
PLEASANT STST 24195416,900
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Money & permits

26 construction projects on file, median $600K — at or below the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Brockton
ProjectYearAward
Ellis Brett Pond Dam Repair DesignFY2026$250K
Ellis Brett Pond Dam Repair DesignFY2018$135K
Ellis Brett Pond Dam Repair DesignFY2021$83K

Public construction projects

26

Median estimated value $600K, middle half $188K–$1.1M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $28.1M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

05 · Next door

Brockton and the 8 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Brockton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Brockton, MA1 / 3720 ft
West Bridgewater, MA3 / 1423 ft
East Bridgewater, MA1 / 1120 ft
Easton, MA0 / 321 ft
Stoughton, MA0 / 222 ft
Abington, MA0 / 221 ft
Avon, MA0 / 220 ft
Holbrook, MA25 ft
Whitman, MA23 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Brockton is the Census county subdivision 2502309000 (Plymouth County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote