Earth Support Corp

Windham CountyVermont

Whitingham, Vermont

3 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. 3 of its 12 inventoried bridges are rated poor (25%, against 4% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

16 ft

middle half 8–32 ft · 587 logs

Bridges rated poor

3

of 12 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

3

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Windham County

$44.3M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Dams & disasters

3 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Windham County-wide context, not a Whitingham number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Whitingham
DamConditionBuilt
Ryder PondEast Branch North RiverPoor1972
Lake SadawgaHarriman Reservoir-TrPoor1880
Lake Sadawga West DikeHarriman Reservoir-TrPoor1880

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Windham County

$44.3M

Federal share obligated across 878 projects in 7 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (86%); roads & bridges took $38.3M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

3 of 12 bridges are rated poor — above the Vermont rate of 4%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Whitingham. Median age 87 years; 4 posted for weight.

50% good, 25% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good6 · 50%
  • Fair3 · 25%
  • Poor3 · 25%
n = 12 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1910s4
1930s4
1970s1
2000s2
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Whitingham
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
C3067postedNORTH RIVER191930
C3063postedNORTH RIVER191920
C3064postedNORTH RIVER191910
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 16 ft down

From 587 depth-to-rock records inside Whitingham (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Whitingham's logs reach rock between 8 and 32 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 16 ft
VT 20 ft
02040 ft
0501001502000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 587 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–574
5–10101
10–20147
20–50180
50–10068
100+17

Rock within 10 ft

34%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 13% of logs here go past 50 ft.

04 · Money & permits

2 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

2

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

05 · Next door

Whitingham and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Whitingham compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Whitingham, VT3 / 1216 ft
Wilmington, VT1 / 2315 ft
Halifax, VT1 / 2015 ft
Readsboro, VT1 / 1119 ft
Rowe, MA2 / 821 ft
Heath, MA0 / 515 ft
Monroe, MA0 / 3

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Whitingham is the Census county subdivision 5002583950 (Windham County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote