Earth Support Corp

Washington CountyVermont

Waitsfield, Vermont

Bedrock sits a median 36 ft down across 637 logs, deeper than the Vermont median of 20 ft. 1 of its 11 inventoried bridges is rated poor (9%, against 4% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

36 ft

middle half 15–80 ft · 637 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 11 inventoried

Mapped landslides

47

USGS inventory points

FEMA repair $, Washington County

$567M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 36 ft down

From 637 depth-to-rock records inside Waitsfield (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Waitsfield's logs reach rock between 15 and 80 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 36 ft
VT 20 ft
050100 ft
0501001502000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 637 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–528
5–1066
10–20109
20–50173
50–100171
100+90

Rock within 10 ft

20%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 40% of logs here go past 50 ft.

Mapped landslides

47

38 earth landslide · 7 landslide · 1 gully · 1 earth gully. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.

02 · Bridges

1 of 11 bridges are rated poor — above the Vermont rate of 4%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Waitsfield. Median age 87 years; 5 posted for weight.

27% good, 9% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good3 · 27%
  • Fair7 · 64%
  • Poor1 · 9%
n = 11 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19102
1910s1
1930s3
1940s1
1950s1
1980s1
1990s1
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Waitsfield
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
C3008postedMAD RIVER1955300
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Dams & disasters

Washington County has drawn $567M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Washington County-wide context, not a Waitsfield number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Washington County

$567M

Federal share obligated across 1,643 projects in 26 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (62%); roads & bridges took $87.9M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Money & permits

1 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

1

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

05 · Next door

Waitsfield and the 5 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Waitsfield compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Waitsfield, VT1 / 1136 ft
Northfield, VT3 / 2910 ft
Warren, VT0 / 1217 ft
Duxbury, VT1 / 1122 ft
Fayston, VT1 / 1025 ft
Moretown, VT0 / 926 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Waitsfield is the Census county subdivision 5002375325 (Washington County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote