Earth Support Corp

Rutland CountyVermont

Pittsford, Vermont

Bedrock sits a median 60 ft down across 478 logs, deeper than the Vermont median of 20 ft. None of its 10 inventoried bridges is rated poor.

Median depth to bedrock

60 ft

middle half 20–122 ft · 478 logs

Bridges rated poor

0

of 10 inventoried

FEMA repair $, Rutland County

$24.0M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Deep ground: 53% of logs go past 50 ft before rock

From 478 depth-to-rock records inside Pittsford (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Pittsford's logs reach rock between 20 and 122 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 60 ft
VT 20 ft
0100200 ft
0501001502000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 478 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–536
5–1034
10–2048
20–5092
50–100113
100+155

Rock within 10 ft

18%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 53% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Bridges

None of Pittsford's 10 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Pittsford. Median age 87 years; 6 posted for weight.

30% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good3 · 30%
  • Fair7 · 70%
  • Poor0 · 0%
n = 10 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19104
1930s1
1940s3
1960s1
1980s1

03 · Dams & disasters

Rutland County has drawn $24.0M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Rutland County-wide context, not a Pittsford number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Rutland County

$24.0M

Federal share obligated across 536 projects in 8 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (69%); roads & bridges took $16.5M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Money & permits

1 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

1

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

05 · Next door

Pittsford and the 8 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Pittsford compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Pittsford, VT0 / 1060 ft
Castleton, VT1 / 2622 ft
Chittenden, VT0 / 1933 ft
West Rutland, VT0 / 1425 ft
Brandon, VT0 / 1448 ft
Rutland town, VT0 / 1053 ft
Proctor, VT0 / 312 ft
Hubbardton, VT0 / 210 ft
Sudbury, VT0 / 112 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Pittsford is the Census county subdivision 5002155600 (Rutland County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote