Earth Support Corp

Chittenden CountyVermont

Hinesburg, Vermont

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 20 ft down across 891 logs, close to the Vermont median of 20 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

20 ft

middle half 9–50 ft · 891 logs

Bridges rated poor

2

of 9 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

Mapped landslides

14

USGS inventory points

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Chittenden County-wide context, not a Hinesburg number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Hinesburg
DamConditionBuilt
Lower PondPatrick BrookPoor1867

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Chittenden County

$51.8M

Federal share obligated across 522 projects in 16 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (61%); roads & bridges took $13.1M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 20 ft down

From 891 depth-to-rock records inside Hinesburg (Vermont DEC well records). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Hinesburg's logs reach rock between 9 and 50 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Vermont median.
median 20 ft
VT 20 ft
0255075 ft
0501001502002500–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 891 logsSource: Vermont DEC well records
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–590
5–10134
10–20182
20–50248
50–100172
100+65

Rock within 10 ft

32%

of logs (34% across Vermont). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 24% of logs here go past 50 ft.

Mapped landslides

14

13 landslide · 1 earth landslide. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.

03 · Bridges

2 of 9 bridges are rated poor — above the Vermont rate of 4%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Hinesburg. Median age 77 years; 3 posted for weight.

44% good, 22% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good4 · 44%
  • Fair3 · 33%
  • Poor2 · 22%
n = 9 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1930s1
1940s4
1950s1
1990s2
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Hinesburg
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
TR 05 FAS 212postedHOLLOW BROOK19401,600
C3008postedLAPLATTE RIVER199510
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Next door

Hinesburg and the 8 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Hinesburg compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Hinesburg, VT2 / 920 ft
Richmond, VT0 / 2335 ft
Huntington, VT0 / 2034 ft
Starksboro, VT1 / 1025 ft
Williston, VT0 / 1023 ft
Charlotte, VT1 / 634 ft
Shelburne, VT0 / 412 ft
Monkton, VT0 / 241 ft
St. George, VT24 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Hinesburg is the Census county subdivision 5000733475 (Chittenden County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote