Earth Support Corp

Washington CountyRhode Island

North Kingstown, Rhode Island

2 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. 5 of its 34 inventoried bridges are rated poor (15%, against 14% statewide).

Bridges rated poor

5

of 34 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

2

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Washington County

$24.5M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Dams & disasters

2 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Washington County-wide context, not a North Kingstown number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in North Kingstown
DamConditionBuilt
Rodman MillAnnaquatucket RiverPoor
Slocum Road UpperChipuxet River-TribPoor

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Washington County

$24.5M

Federal share obligated across 529 projects in 8 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (72%); roads & bridges took $1.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

5 of 34 bridges are rated poor — about the same as the Rhode Island rate of 14%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside North Kingstown. Median age 32 years; 6 posted for weight.

29% good, 15% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good10 · 29%
  • Fair19 · 56%
  • Poor5 · 15%

Structures by decade built

02468101214pre-19101910s1920s1930s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
n = 34 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19101
1910s1
1920s1
1930s3
1950s1
1960s3
1970s1
1980s2
1990s5
2000s13
2010s2
2020s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in North Kingstown
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
US 1 TOWER HILL RDRI 138196946,800
DEVILS FOOT RDpostedAMTRAK20075,252
EXETER RDpostedAMTRAK19361,787
AUSTIN RDpostedPOTOWOMUT POND1979747
HATCHERY RDpostedAMTRAK1901606
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Next door

North Kingstown and the 5 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
North Kingstown compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridges
North Kingstown, RI5 / 34
Warwick, RI10 / 60
South Kingstown, RI1 / 20
East Greenwich, RI2 / 17
Exeter, RI1 / 13
Narragansett, RI1 / 9

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

North Kingstown is the Census county subdivision 4400951580 (Washington County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote