Earth Support Corp

Rockingham CountyNew Hampshire

Nottingham, New Hampshire

2 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 13 ft down across 1,067 logs, shallower than the New Hampshire median of 20 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

13 ft

middle half 8–25 ft · 1,067 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 7 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

2

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Rockingham County

$22.0M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Dams & disasters

2 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Rockingham County-wide context, not a Nottingham number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Nottingham
DamConditionBuilt
Mendums Pond DamLittle RiverPoor1840
Pawtuckaway Lake Dollof DamExeter RiverPoor1920

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Rockingham County

$22.0M

Federal share obligated across 662 projects in 14 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (79%); roads & bridges took $2.0M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 13 ft down

From 1,067 depth-to-rock records inside Nottingham (NH DES well inventory). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Nottingham's logs reach rock between 8 and 25 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = New Hampshire median.
median 13 ft
NH 20 ft
02040 ft
01002003004000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 1,067 logsSource: NH DES well inventory
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–5102
5–10241
10–20353
20–50242
50–100109
100+20

Rock within 10 ft

39%

of logs (31% across New Hampshire). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 11% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Bridges

1 of 7 bridges are rated poor — above the New Hampshire rate of 8%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Nottingham. Median age 56 years.

57% good, 14% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good4 · 57%
  • Fair2 · 29%
  • Poor1 · 14%
n = 7 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1920s1
1940s1
1960s1
1970s1
1990s1
2000s1
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Nottingham
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
NH152NORTH RIVER19253,719
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Next door

Nottingham and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Nottingham compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Nottingham, NH1 / 713 ft
Raymond, NH1 / 1711 ft
Epping, NH0 / 1617 ft
Lee, NH0 / 818 ft
Deerfield, NH0 / 514 ft
Barrington, NH0 / 418 ft
Northwood, NH0 / 114 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Nottingham is the Census county subdivision 3301557460 (Rockingham County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote