Earth Support Corp

Grafton CountyNew Hampshire

Littleton, New Hampshire

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. Bedrock sits a median 18 ft down across 360 logs, close to the New Hampshire median of 20 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

18 ft

middle half 8–48 ft · 360 logs

Bridges rated poor

0

of 27 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Grafton County

$53.0M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Grafton County-wide context, not a Littleton number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Littleton
DamConditionBuilt
Dells Pond Outlet DamBranch RiverPoor1910

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Grafton County

$53.0M

Federal share obligated across 611 projects in 16 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (41%); roads & bridges took $21.5M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 18 ft down

From 360 depth-to-rock records inside Littleton (NH DES well inventory). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Littleton's logs reach rock between 8 and 48 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = New Hampshire median.
median 18 ft
NH 20 ft
0255075 ft
0204060801000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 360 logsSource: NH DES well inventory
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–553
5–1050
10–2081
20–5086
50–10060
100+30

Rock within 10 ft

33%

of logs (31% across New Hampshire). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 23% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Bridges

None of Littleton's 27 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Littleton. Median age 50 years.

63% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good17 · 63%
  • Fair10 · 37%
  • Poor0 · 0%

Structures by decade built

02468101930s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s
n = 27 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1930s1
1950s8
1960s3
1970s2
1980s10
1990s1
2000s1
2010s1

04 · Next door

Littleton and the 9 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Littleton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Littleton, NH0 / 2718 ft
Barnet, VT4 / 3715 ft
Waterford, VT2 / 2118 ft
Bethlehem, NH2 / 1735 ft
Concord, VT1 / 1428 ft
Lisbon, NH3 / 1318 ft
Sugar Hill, NH1 / 520 ft
Dalton, NH0 / 442 ft
Lyman, NH0 / 318 ft
Monroe, NH0 / 325 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Littleton is the Census county subdivision 3300942580 (Grafton County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote