Earth Support Corp

Coos CountyNew Hampshire

Dixville, New Hampshire

2 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. None of its 2 inventoried bridges is rated poor.

Bridges rated poor

0

of 2 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

2

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Coos County

$7.8M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Dams & disasters

2 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Coos County-wide context, not a Dixville number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Dixville
DamConditionBuilt
Lake Gloriette DikeSuncook RiverPoor1920
Lake Gloriette DamPawtuckaway RiverPoor1842

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Coos County

$7.8M

Federal share obligated across 184 projects in 11 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is roads & bridges (81%); roads & bridges took $6.2M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

None of Dixville's 2 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Dixville. Median age 42 years.

50% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good1 · 50%
  • Fair1 · 50%
  • Poor0 · 0%
n = 2 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1950s1
2010s1

03 · Next door

Dixville and the 9 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Dixville compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Dixville, NH0 / 2
Colebrook, NH1 / 1422 ft
Stewartstown, NH0 / 814 ft
Errol, NH0 / 548 ft
Columbia, NH0 / 530 ft
Millsfield, NH0 / 238 ft
Clarksville, NH0 / 110 ft
Wentworth location, NH
Ervings, NH
Dixs, NH

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Dixville is the Census county subdivision 3300718420 (Coos County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote