Earth Support Corp

Piscataquis CountyMaine

Milo, Maine

Bedrock sits a median 63 ft down across 70 logs, deeper than the Maine median of 15 ft. 4 of its 7 inventoried bridges are rated poor (57%, against 15% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

63 ft

middle half 32–88 ft · 70 logs

Bridges rated poor

4

of 7 inventoried

FEMA repair $, Piscataquis County

$4.3M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Deep ground: 63% of logs go past 50 ft before rock

From 70 depth-to-rock records inside Milo (Maine Geological Survey wells database). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Milo's logs reach rock between 32 and 88 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Maine median.
median 63 ft
ME 15 ft
050100 ft
0102030400–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 70 logsSource: Maine Geological Survey wells database
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–51
5–102
10–207
20–5015
50–10031
100+14

Rock within 10 ft

9%

of logs (40% across Maine). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 63% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Bridges

4 of 7 bridges are rated poor — above the Maine rate of 15%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Milo. Median age 95 years; 1 posted for weight.

29% good, 57% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good2 · 29%
  • Fair1 · 14%
  • Poor4 · 57%
n = 7 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1910s2
1920s1
1930s2
2020s2

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Milo
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
W MAIN STSEBEC RIVER19316,037
MAIN STSEBEC RIVER19156,037
MAIN STSEBEC RIVER19156,037
DESMOND RDpostedALDER STREAM193563
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Dams & disasters

Piscataquis County has drawn $4.3M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Piscataquis County-wide context, not a Milo number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Piscataquis County

$4.3M

Federal share obligated across 102 projects in 4 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (55%); roads & bridges took $1.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Next door

Milo and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Milo compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Milo, ME4 / 763 ft
Northeast Piscataquis, ME2 / 1341 ft
Brownville, ME0 / 440 ft
Medford, ME1 / 380 ft
Southeast Piscataquis, ME0 / 225 ft
Sebec, ME0 / 212 ft
Lake View, ME62 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Milo is the Census county subdivision 2302146020 (Piscataquis County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote