Earth Support Corp

Aroostook CountyMaine

Fort Fairfield, Maine

Bedrock sits a median 8 ft down across 56 logs, shallower than the Maine median of 15 ft. 3 high-hazard dams are rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition.

Median depth to bedrock

8 ft

middle half 6–13 ft · 56 logs

Bridges rated poor

2

of 6 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

3

National Inventory of Dams

FEMA repair $, Aroostook County

$10.9M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Ground

Rock is close to the surface: 64% of logs hit it within 10 ft

From 56 depth-to-rock records inside Fort Fairfield (Maine Geological Survey wells database). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Fort Fairfield's logs reach rock between 6 and 13 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Maine median.
median 8 ft
ME 15 ft
01020 ft
05101520250–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 56 logsSource: Maine Geological Survey wells database
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–57
5–1024
10–2017
20–505
50–1003
100+0

Rock within 10 ft

64%

of logs (40% across Maine). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 4% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Dams & disasters

3 high-hazard dams need work

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Aroostook County-wide context, not a Fort Fairfield number.
High-hazard dams in poor condition in Fort Fairfield
DamConditionBuilt
Bryant PondLibby BrookUnsatisfactory1964
Libby BrookLibbyUnsatisfactory1965
ChristinaPrestile StreamPoor1967

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

FEMA Public Assistance, Aroostook County

$10.9M

Federal share obligated across 120 projects in 2 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (90%); roads & bridges took $559K.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

03 · Bridges

2 of 6 bridges are rated poor — above the Maine rate of 15%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Fort Fairfield. Median age 69 years.

0% good, 33% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good0 · 0%
  • Fair4 · 67%
  • Poor2 · 33%
n = 6 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1930s1
1950s3
1960s1
2000s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Fort Fairfield
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
LIMESTONE RDAROOSTOOK RIV ABANDD RR19563,620
MAIN STPATTIE BROOK19302,210
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Next door

Fort Fairfield and the 4 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Fort Fairfield compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Fort Fairfield, ME2 / 68 ft
Caribou, ME2 / 1710 ft
Presque Isle, ME1 / 89 ft
Limestone, ME1 / 715 ft
Easton, ME0 / 38 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Fort Fairfield is the Census county subdivision 2300325615 (Aroostook County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote