Earth Support Corp

Plymouth CountyMassachusetts

Middleborough, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 40 ft down across 344 logs, deeper than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 1 of its 38 inventoried bridges is rated poor (3%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

40 ft

middle half 25–58 ft · 344 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 38 inventoried

State resilience grants

$1.1M

2 awards on file

Construction projects

19

median $5.5M · public bid results

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 40 ft down

From 344 depth-to-rock records inside Middleborough (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Middleborough's logs reach rock between 25 and 58 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 40 ft
MA 24 ft
0255075 ft
0501001502000–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 344 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–52
5–1011
10–2037
20–50168
50–100110
100+16

Rock within 10 ft

6%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 31% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Bridges

1 of 38 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Middleborough. Median age 68 years; 1 posted for weight.

29% good, 3% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good11 · 29%
  • Fair26 · 68%
  • Poor1 · 3%

Structures by decade built

024681012pre-19101910s1920s1930s1950s1960s1970s1990s2000s2010s2020s
n = 38 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19105
1910s2
1920s2
1930s1
1950s11
1960s10
1970s1
1990s2
2000s2
2010s1
2020s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Middleborough
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
US 44 HARDING STMBTA/CSX196331,681
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Money & permits

19 construction projects on file, median $5.5M — above the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Middleborough
ProjectYearAward
Stony Brook Pond Dam ImprovementsFY2026$1.0M
FY23 Stony Brook Pond Dam Repair DesignFY2023$109K

Public construction projects

19

Median estimated value $5.5M, middle half $547K–$18.3M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $311M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

04 · Dams & disasters

Plymouth County has drawn $60.4M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Plymouth County-wide context, not a Middleborough number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Plymouth County

$60.4M

Federal share obligated across 866 projects in 10 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (65%); roads & bridges took $1.6M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

Middleborough and the 9 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Middleborough compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Middleborough, MA1 / 3840 ft
Taunton, MA3 / 4335 ft
Wareham, MA3 / 4141 ft
Raynham, MA0 / 1828 ft
Bridgewater Town, MA1 / 1430 ft
Lakeville, MA0 / 1046 ft
Carver, MA0 / 555 ft
Halifax, MA0 / 560 ft
Plympton, MA0 / 230 ft
Rochester, MA42 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Middleborough is the Census county subdivision 2502340850 (Plymouth County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote