Earth Support Corp

Essex CountyMassachusetts

Lawrence, Massachusetts

10 of its 43 inventoried bridges are rated poor (23%, against 9% statewide). Bedrock sits a median 44 ft down across 39 logs, deeper than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft.

Median depth to bedrock

44 ft

middle half 32–68 ft · 39 logs

Bridges rated poor

10

of 43 inventoried

Construction projects

26

median $1.7M · public bid results

FEMA repair $, Essex County

$107M

federal share since 2010 · county-wide

01 · Bridges

10 of 43 bridges are rated poor — above the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Lawrence. Median age 64 years; 5 posted for weight.

16% good, 23% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good7 · 16%
  • Fair26 · 60%
  • Poor10 · 23%

Structures by decade built

02468101214pre-19101910s1920s1930s1960s1990s2000s2010s
n = 43 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19104
1910s4
1920s4
1930s8
1960s13
1990s1
2000s6
2010s3

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Lawrence
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
I 495 & ACCESS RPSMERRIMACK RIVER196279,000
I 495 UPPER LEVELI 495 LOWER LEVEL196273,359
AMESBURY STpostedSOUTH CANAL191838,100
UNION STNORTH CANAL186018,300
ST 28 BROADWAYSPICKET RIVER190012,808
SALEM STMBTA/BMRR192812,600
LOWELL STBMRR (ABANDONED)192711,000
I 495 SB RAMP LMERRIMACK ST & MBT196310,371
SHORT STSPICKET RIVER18505,255
DAISY STpostedSPICKET RIVER19393,202
Every poor bridge in New England

02 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 44 ft down

From 39 depth-to-rock records inside Lawrence (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Lawrence's logs reach rock between 32 and 68 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 44 ft
MA 24 ft
0204060 ft
051015200–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 39 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–50
5–101
10–203
20–5018
50–10016
100+1

Rock within 10 ft

3%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 44% of logs here go past 50 ft.

03 · Dams & disasters

Essex County has drawn $107M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Essex County-wide context, not a Lawrence number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Essex County

$107M

Federal share obligated across 1,095 projects in 10 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (79%); roads & bridges took $1.3M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

04 · Money & permits

26 construction projects on file, median $1.7M — above the state's $1.5M

Public construction projects

26

Median estimated value $1.7M, middle half $600K–$14.7M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $289M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

05 · Next door

Lawrence and the 3 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Lawrence compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Lawrence, MA10 / 4344 ft
Andover, MA7 / 3817 ft
Methuen, MA5 / 3123 ft
North Andover, MA2 / 216 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Lawrence is the Census county subdivision 2500934550 (Essex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote