Earth Support Corp

Hampden CountyMassachusetts

Holyoke, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 40 ft down across 67 logs, deeper than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 2 of its 51 inventoried bridges are rated poor (4%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

40 ft

middle half 10–82 ft · 67 logs

Bridges rated poor

2

of 51 inventoried

State resilience grants

$438K

2 awards on file

Mapped landslides

1

USGS inventory points

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 40 ft down

From 67 depth-to-rock records inside Holyoke (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Holyoke's logs reach rock between 10 and 82 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 40 ft
MA 24 ft
050100 ft
051015200–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 67 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–57
5–107
10–2014
20–5010
50–10019
100+10

Rock within 10 ft

28%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 43% of logs here go past 50 ft.

Mapped landslides

1

1 mudslide. Inventory points from the USGS U.S. Landslide Inventory; many are prehistoric slides mapped from lidar.

02 · Bridges

2 of 51 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Holyoke. Median age 61 years; 4 posted for weight.

16% good, 4% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good8 · 16%
  • Fair41 · 80%
  • Poor2 · 4%

Structures by decade built

051015202530pre-19101910s1920s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2010s2020s
n = 51 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19109
1910s1
1920s3
1950s1
1960s26
1970s3
1980s1
1990s3
2010s3
2020s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Holyoke
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
ST141 APPLETON STpostedFIRST LEVEL CANAL19199,698
ST141 APPLETON STpostedSECOND LEVEL CANAL19215,431
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Money & permits

22 construction projects on file, median $2.1M — above the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Holyoke
ProjectYearAward
Holyoke Levee Pump Stations 5-7 Improvements DesignFY2026$250K
Holyoke Levee Control System Improvements Pump Station DesignFY2025$188K

Public construction projects

22

Median estimated value $2.1M, middle half $215K–$8.0M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $291M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

04 · Dams & disasters

Hampden County has drawn $181M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Hampden County-wide context, not a Holyoke number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Hampden County

$181M

Federal share obligated across 652 projects in 6 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (40%); roads & bridges took $979K.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

Holyoke and the 7 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Holyoke compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Holyoke, MA2 / 5140 ft
Chicopee, MA2 / 4791 ft
Westfield, MA0 / 3735 ft
West Springfield Town, MA2 / 2652 ft
Easthampton, MA3 / 1756 ft
Southampton, MA1 / 1420 ft
South Hadley, MA1 / 1163 ft
Hadley, MA1 / 9125 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Holyoke is the Census county subdivision 2501330840 (Hampden County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote