Earth Support Corp

Worcester CountyMassachusetts

Charlton, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 15 ft down across 440 logs, shallower than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 1 of its 26 inventoried bridges is rated poor (4%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

15 ft

middle half 8–28 ft · 440 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 26 inventoried

State resilience grants

$90K

1 award on file

Construction projects

12

median $1.0M · public bid results

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 15 ft down

From 440 depth-to-rock records inside Charlton (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Charlton's logs reach rock between 8 and 28 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 15 ft
MA 24 ft
0204060 ft
0501001500–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 440 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–538
5–1080
10–20142
20–50123
50–10047
100+10

Rock within 10 ft

38%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 12% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Bridges

1 of 26 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Charlton. Median age 69 years.

19% good, 4% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good5 · 19%
  • Fair20 · 77%
  • Poor1 · 4%

Structures by decade built

051015201910s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s2010s
n = 26 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1910s1
1940s3
1950s17
1960s1
1970s2
1980s1
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Charlton
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
US 20 STURBRDGE RDCADY BROOK195728,000
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Money & permits

12 construction projects on file, median $1.0M — at or below the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Charlton
ProjectYearAward
Lower Sibley Pond Dam Removal Feasibility AssessmentFY2026$90K

Public construction projects

12

Median estimated value $1.0M, middle half $249K–$83.9M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $381M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

04 · Dams & disasters

Worcester County has drawn $85.3M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Worcester County-wide context, not a Charlton number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Worcester County

$85.3M

Federal share obligated across 882 projects in 9 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (91%); roads & bridges took $723K.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

Charlton and the 7 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Charlton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Charlton, MA1 / 2615 ft
Sturbridge, MA1 / 3616 ft
Oxford, MA3 / 3425 ft
Southbridge Town, MA1 / 1410 ft
Spencer, MA1 / 1221 ft
Dudley, MA2 / 1018 ft
East Brookfield, MA0 / 744 ft
Leicester, MA0 / 715 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Charlton is the Census county subdivision 2502712715 (Worcester County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote