Earth Support Corp

Middlesex CountyMassachusetts

Acton, Massachusetts

Bedrock sits a median 15 ft down across 353 logs, shallower than the Massachusetts median of 24 ft. 1 of its 19 inventoried bridges is rated poor (5%, against 9% statewide).

Median depth to bedrock

15 ft

middle half 8–33 ft · 353 logs

Bridges rated poor

1

of 19 inventoried

State resilience grants

$1.3M

4 awards on file

Construction projects

17

median $950K · public bid results

01 · Ground

Rock turns up a median 15 ft down

From 353 depth-to-rock records inside Acton (MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs). Logs cluster where people drill wells and bore for roads, so treat this as the town’s pattern, not a site answer.

Half of Acton's logs reach rock between 8 and 33 ft

Depth to bedrock: 10th–90th percentile whisker, middle-half box, median tick; dashed line = Massachusetts median.
median 15 ft
MA 24 ft
02040 ft
0204060801001200–5 ft5–10 ft10–20 ft20–50 ft50–100 ft100+ ft
n = 353 logsSource: MassGIS / MGS borings & well logs
▸ Show the numbers
Depth to rock (ft)Logs
0–534
5–1073
10–20101
20–50100
50–10035
100+10

Rock within 10 ft

37%

of logs (23% across Massachusetts). Shallow rock means ledge in excavations, refusal for driven piles and rock anchors rather than soil nails; deep ground means taller shoring and more groundwater. 12% of logs here go past 50 ft.

02 · Money & permits

17 construction projects on file, median $950K — at or below the state's $1.5M

State resilience grant awards in Acton
ProjectYearAward
FY23 53 River Street Dam RemovalFY2023$1.0M
Bellows Farm Mill Dam Removal and Nashoba Brook Restoration DesignFY2025$127K
53 River Street Dam RemovalFY2020$113K
53 River Street Dam Removal DesignFY2021$75K

Public construction projects

17

Median estimated value $950K, middle half $750K–$4.9M, against $1.5M across Massachusetts. Capped total $56.8M (each project counted at no more than $100M). Public bid records compiled June 2026, heavy on 2021–22 — a sample, not an annual market.

03 · Bridges

1 of 19 bridges are rated poor — below the Massachusetts rate of 9%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Acton. Median age 76 years; 1 posted for weight.

21% good, 5% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good4 · 21%
  • Fair14 · 74%
  • Poor1 · 5%

Structures by decade built

012345pre-19101920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1980s1990s2010s
n = 19 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19103
1920s2
1930s2
1940s1
1950s5
1960s1
1980s2
1990s2
2010s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Acton
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
ST119 /ST2 ANASHOBA BROOK194012,463
Every poor bridge in New England

04 · Dams & disasters

Middlesex County has drawn $656M in federal disaster repair since 2010

FEMA Public Assistance is reported by county, so the figure below is Middlesex County-wide context, not a Acton number.

FEMA Public Assistance, Middlesex County

$656M

Federal share obligated across 1,729 projects in 12 declared disasters since 2010. The largest category is emergency protective measures (97%); roads & bridges took $1.2M.
Dams, disasters & moving ground

05 · Next door

Acton and the 8 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Acton compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Acton, MA1 / 1915 ft
Concord, MA1 / 2140 ft
Littleton, MA0 / 2122 ft
Westford, MA3 / 2122 ft
Maynard, MA1 / 932 ft
Stow, MA2 / 735 ft
Sudbury, MA1 / 640 ft
Boxborough, MA1 / 218 ft
Carlisle, MA12 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Acton is the Census county subdivision 2501700380 (Middlesex County). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses. Construction-project figures come from Massachusetts public bid results, published as town-level counts, medians and capped totals (n ≥ 10).

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote