Earth Support Corp

Northeastern Connecticut Planning RegionConnecticut

Thompson, Connecticut

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. 5 of its 33 inventoried bridges are rated poor (15%, against 5% statewide).

Bridges rated poor

5

of 33 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

High-hazard dams in poor condition in Thompson
DamConditionBuilt
North Grosvenordale DamFrench RiverPoor1900

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

5 of 33 bridges are rated poor — above the Connecticut rate of 5%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Thompson. Median age 61 years; 3 posted for weight.

9% good, 15% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good3 · 9%
  • Fair25 · 76%
  • Poor5 · 15%

Structures by decade built

0510151920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s
n = 33 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1920s1
1930s6
1940s3
1950s3
1960s14
1970s2
1980s2
1990s1
2000s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Thompson
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
BUCKLEY HILL ROADFRENCH RIVER19372,300
BUCKLEY HILL ROADpostedFRENCH RIVER CANAL19762,300
WILSONVILLE ROADFRENCH RIVER19361,300
SPICER ROADFIVE MILE RIVER1972275
BAKER ROADpostedQUADDICK LAKE1940246
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Next door

Thompson and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Thompson compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridgesRock depth
Thompson, CT5 / 33
Putnam, CT2 / 27
Burrillville, RI6 / 22
Dudley, MA2 / 1018 ft
Woodstock, CT2 / 9
Webster, MA0 / 928 ft
Douglas, MA0 / 819 ft

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Thompson is the Census county subdivision 0915075870 (Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote