Earth Support Corp

Capitol Planning RegionConnecticut

New Britain, Connecticut

None of its 61 inventoried bridges is rated poor.

Bridges rated poor

0

of 61 inventoried

01 · Bridges

None of New Britain's 61 bridges is rated poor

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside New Britain. Median age 51 years.

10% good, 0% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good6 · 10%
  • Fair55 · 90%
  • Poor0 · 0%

Structures by decade built

0102030401930s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s
n = 61 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1930s2
1950s2
1960s11
1970s35
1980s5
1990s5
2000s1

02 · Money & permits

50 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

50

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

03 · Next door

New Britain and the 5 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
New Britain compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridges
New Britain, CT0 / 61
Southington, CT4 / 62
Berlin, CT1 / 45
Farmington, CT0 / 31
Plainville, CT2 / 30
Newington, CT0 / 25

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

New Britain is the Census county subdivision 0911050440 (Capitol Planning Region). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote