Earth Support Corp

South Central Connecticut Planning RegionConnecticut

Meriden, Connecticut

3 of its 82 inventoried bridges are rated poor (4%, against 5% statewide).

Bridges rated poor

3

of 82 inventoried · 1 closed

01 · Bridges

3 of 82 bridges are rated poor — about the same as the Connecticut rate of 5%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Meriden. Median age 61 years; 1 closed.

12% good, 4% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good10 · 12%
  • Fair69 · 84%
  • Poor3 · 4%

Structures by decade built

010203040pre-19101910s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
n = 82 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19105
1910s1
1930s3
1940s7
1950s2
1960s35
1970s18
1980s5
1990s2
2000s1
2010s2
2020s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Meriden
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
INTERSTATE-691 EBINTERSTATE-91196522,500
CENTER STREETclosedHARBOR BROOK18716,186
OREGON ROADQUINNIPIAC RIVER19634,900
Every poor bridge in New England

02 · Money & permits

54 ground-related permits in the city's open data

Ground-related permits in open data

54

Permits in the city’s open-data portal that mention retaining walls, excavation or foundations. Only a handful of portals are read, so this counts what is published, not everything built.

03 · Next door

Meriden and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Meriden compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridges
Meriden, CT3 / 82
Southington, CT4 / 62
Middletown, CT3 / 57
Berlin, CT1 / 45
Wallingford, CT4 / 44
Cheshire, CT0 / 32
Middlefield, CT0 / 8

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Meriden is the Census county subdivision 0917046520 (South Central Connecticut Planning Region). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote