Earth Support Corp

Capitol Planning RegionConnecticut

Mansfield, Connecticut

1 high-hazard dam is rated in poor or unsatisfactory condition. 4 of its 33 inventoried bridges are rated poor (12%, against 5% statewide).

Bridges rated poor

4

of 33 inventoried

Poor high-hazard dams

1

National Inventory of Dams

01 · Dams & disasters

1 high-hazard dam needs work

High-hazard dams in poor condition in Mansfield
DamConditionBuilt
Mirror Lake DamRoberts BrookPoor

High hazard potential means failure would probably cost lives — it rates the consequences, not the dam’s condition.

Dams, disasters & moving ground

02 · Bridges

4 of 33 bridges are rated poor — above the Connecticut rate of 5%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Mansfield. Median age 55 years; 3 posted for weight.

36% good, 12% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good12 · 36%
  • Fair17 · 52%
  • Poor4 · 12%

Structures by decade built

024681012pre-19101910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1970s1980s1990s2010s
n = 33 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
pre-19101
1910s1
1920s2
1930s1
1940s2
1950s7
1970s12
1980s1
1990s2
2010s4

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Mansfield
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
ROUTE 31postedNEW ENGLAND CENTRAL RR19474,600
BASSETTS BRIDGE RDNAUBESATUCK LAKE19502,700
FLANDERS ROADWILLIMANTIC RIVER1914800
ATWOODVILLE ROADpostedMOUNT HOPE RIVER1950430
Every poor bridge in New England

03 · Next door

Mansfield and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Mansfield compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridges
Mansfield, CT4 / 33
Coventry, CT0 / 24
Tolland, CT4 / 19
Windham, CT0 / 16
Willington, CT0 / 15
Ashford, CT1 / 9
Chaplin, CT0 / 5

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Mansfield is the Census county subdivision 0911044910 (Capitol Planning Region). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote