Earth Support Corp

Southeastern Connecticut Planning RegionConnecticut

Griswold, Connecticut

2 of its 25 inventoried bridges are rated poor (8%, against 5% statewide).

Bridges rated poor

2

of 25 inventoried

01 · Bridges

2 of 25 bridges are rated poor — above the Connecticut rate of 5%

Every highway bridge and large culvert in the 2025 National Bridge Inventory that stands inside Griswold. Median age 68 years; 1 posted for weight.

28% good, 8% poor

FHWA good / fair / poor rating — the lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert.
  • Good7 · 28%
  • Fair16 · 64%
  • Poor2 · 8%

Structures by decade built

0246810121930s1940s1950s1980s1990s2010s2020s
n = 25 structuresSource: FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025
▸ Show the numbers
BuiltStructures
1930s4
1940s2
1950s11
1980s1
1990s1
2010s5
2020s1

The poor-rated bridges

Bridges rated poor in Griswold
CarriesOverBuiltDaily traffic
INTERSTATE-395BISHOP CROSSING RD195834,800
TAYLOR HILL ROADINTERSTATE-3951958645
Every poor bridge in New England

02 · Next door

Griswold and the 6 towns that border it

A dash means no data for that layer, not zero.
Griswold compared with neighbouring towns
TownPoor bridges
Griswold, CT2 / 25
Plainfield, CT1 / 29
North Stonington, CT0 / 23
Canterbury, CT3 / 13
Preston, CT0 / 9
Lisbon, CT0 / 6
Voluntown, CT1 / 4

Where these numbers come from

Method, sources & caveats

Griswold is the Census county subdivision 0918033900 (Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region). Every record is placed here by its coordinates, not by the place name the source uses.

  • Towns are Census county subdivisions: cities, towns, plantations, and Maine/New Hampshire unorganized territories and townships. Every record is placed in a town by its coordinates (point-in-polygon), not by the source's own place label — so a bridge in Roxbury counts for Boston and a well in 'North Waltham' counts for Waltham.
  • Bridges: FHWA NBI 2025, highway structures ≥ 20 ft including large culverts. 'Poor' is FHWA's good/fair/poor rating (lowest of deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert ≤ 4). Percent-poor is shown only for towns with at least 5 structures.
  • Depth to bedrock is the median of driller- and boring-reported depths in the town, shown only where at least 10 logs exist. Water-well logs over-sample rural lots and hilltops; one town median never describes a particular site.
  • Bedrock depths use the same state databases and filters as the Bedrock & soils module (bedrock wells and borings that reached rock, 0 < depth ≤ 400 ft, exact re-filings dropped), but every log is placed in a town by its coordinates rather than the driller's town field, so town counts can differ slightly between the two pages. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no statewide public well-log database with depths.
  • Dams: only high-hazard-potential dams whose latest condition assessment is Poor or Unsatisfactory are counted (live NID). Connecticut and Rhode Island assessments may lag.
  • FEMA Public Assistance dollars are federal share obligated for disasters declared since 2010, reported by county — they are county context, not a town figure.
  • Grant awards are Massachusetts only (EEA Dam & Seawall program, MVP Action grants, CZM Coastal Resilience). Other states' programs are not yet included.
  • Ground-related permit counts cover only the municipal portals the pipeline reads (Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, Worcester, Framingham, Providence, Portsmouth, Hartford and a few others) — an absent count means 'not covered', not zero.
Data as of
Sep 11, 2026
Generated
Sep 11, 2026
Records
367,748
Refresh
Live pull · weekly

Published by Earth Support Corp as a public resource. Regional statistics for planning and curiosity. They are not an engineering report, a bid recommendation or a statement about any particular site, firm or project. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Full method: methodology.

CallStart Quote